Joined
·
1,221 Posts
I thought I'd share an article that I read in the Pom Review which I thought was very interested. I get a lot of toy magazines even though I don't actively accept judging assignments. The article was information from the AKC Canine Health Foundation Breeder's Symposium and in the syllabus of Peter Vogel DVM, DACVS...he's a specialist in orthopedic surgury, certfied in stemm cell regenerative medicine, micro vascular curgery and critical care......
He said that OFA did not rule out hip dysplasia and was outdated from the 1960's. And that position determined many of the ratings. He said that Dislocation Index (DI) was a better method, DI is Penn Hip. He said a newer better method was DLS, dorsolateral sublaxuation radiograph.......just wondered if you guys know more about these tests etc. He said OfA was a predictive method of Hip dysplasia but does not rule it out.......
He also said that 50% of the dogs with excellent hips will be found to be dysplastic using DI or DLS........67% with good OFA hips are dysplastic and most of the fair ofa are dysplastic. DANG! It didn't say where he got this research or if it was his opinion or what and on what breed. He said that puppies should be done at 14-16 weeks and no later than 20 weeks.....so that intervention can be done to prevent painful changes and that doing hips at 2 years age was too late to prevent pain as they age.
He also said that dysplasia is a common defect and is a polygenic multiple gene cause. Excellent hipped parents can produce puppies with dysplasia. He said it can be exacerbated by trauma, diet, and weight. He also said that the position done during Xrays are not always proper and influence the rating of excellent, fair, etc.
I know there are lots of vets and experience people on the list. Does anyone have more information on this? I have OFA'd my dogs but this concerned me. Do any of you have experience with these tests or opinions?
He said that OFA did not rule out hip dysplasia and was outdated from the 1960's. And that position determined many of the ratings. He said that Dislocation Index (DI) was a better method, DI is Penn Hip. He said a newer better method was DLS, dorsolateral sublaxuation radiograph.......just wondered if you guys know more about these tests etc. He said OfA was a predictive method of Hip dysplasia but does not rule it out.......
He also said that 50% of the dogs with excellent hips will be found to be dysplastic using DI or DLS........67% with good OFA hips are dysplastic and most of the fair ofa are dysplastic. DANG! It didn't say where he got this research or if it was his opinion or what and on what breed. He said that puppies should be done at 14-16 weeks and no later than 20 weeks.....so that intervention can be done to prevent painful changes and that doing hips at 2 years age was too late to prevent pain as they age.
He also said that dysplasia is a common defect and is a polygenic multiple gene cause. Excellent hipped parents can produce puppies with dysplasia. He said it can be exacerbated by trauma, diet, and weight. He also said that the position done during Xrays are not always proper and influence the rating of excellent, fair, etc.
I know there are lots of vets and experience people on the list. Does anyone have more information on this? I have OFA'd my dogs but this concerned me. Do any of you have experience with these tests or opinions?