| Breeding and Breeders Know a good Breeder? Are you a Breeder? Please post here and let us know |  | |
06-12-2008, 06:31 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Big Dog | Quote:
Originally Posted by gracieface strikefire is in the same caliber as Strays, another "greeder" on the dpcc radar, unfortunately the club has no power to do anything about them. | No, but the AKC and CKC do. They need to take a hard line against these breeders and throw up a road block by denying registration to all dogs that come from kennels that breed Z factor. And not just the Z dogs themselves, but all of the dogs. Further, they need to convene a tribunal which looks into unethical breeding practices and where sufficient evidence is found, deny registration until the kennel in question has complied with measurable standards for an arranged period of time. Say, the first offense 3 years, the second 8 years and the third, lifetime. That would put a lot of these people out of business and if not bankrupt entirely, then it would certainly make it very tough to sell their dogs. |
| |
06-12-2008, 07:05 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Alpha
Posts: 1,451
Location: Orillia Dogs Name: Saphire Dogs Age: 06/24/06
Gallery Pics: 9 Visit thea2003's Gallery Thanks: 2,495
Thanked 500 Times in 343 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by White Cleats No, but the AKC and CKC do. They need to take a hard line against these breeders and throw up a road block by denying registration to all dogs that come from kennels that breed Z factor. And not just the Z dogs themselves, but all of the dogs. Further, they need to convene a tribunal which looks into unethical breeding practices and where sufficient evidence is found, deny registration until the kennel in question has complied with measurable standards for an arranged period of time. Say, the first offense 3 years, the second 8 years and the third, lifetime. That would put a lot of these people out of business and if not bankrupt entirely, then it would certainly make it very tough to sell their dogs. | That could happen, but what could and does happen, what happened with the breeder my dog is from, is that they register their dogs under a different name, they have a friend or a relative register the litters for them cuz only "they" are banned from registering the dogs.
The breeder my girl is from was banned a few years ago i beleive and still is breeding(as far as i know?)
Its one of those things that just frustrates you, there are so many ways to get around the "rules"
Some people advertise that "parents are registered but pups will not be"
that makes people go hmmm they are registered dogs that means they cant be that bad...and they are only $700, and i dont need papers anyways it is just a pet.]\
*****SORRY*** just re-read your post, that said deny registration of the dogs. my comment may be null and void now lol |
| |
06-12-2008, 07:24 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Big Dog | Thea2003, yes many of the "banned" breeders will try work-arounds such as you described, but the C/AKC simply needs to watch the lines -- deny registration to dogs from specific parents, regardless of who's doing the registering. That way, it also discourages people from buying breeding stock from kennels who're being currently sanctioned. Let the sanctions follow the dogs themselves, not the breeders, kennels or owners.
And yes, you'll always get a few people who will buy a puppy that cannot be registered. You can't do anything about that. But it will cut down those numbers. And it will certainly damage the financial viability of these kennels -- and that's why they're in business in the first place. Profitability in breeding is so often on the edge of the knife -- cut business by even 50% and most of these kennels will go toe up. |
| |
06-12-2008, 07:31 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Alpha | Quote:
Originally Posted by White Cleats Thea2003, yes many of the "banned" breeders will try work-arounds such as you described, but the C/AKC simply needs to watch the lines -- deny registration to dogs from specific parents, regardless of who's doing the registering. . | The DPCA has tried to get the AKC to deny registration to albinos and z factored dogs for over 30 years now..it ain't ever gonna happen.
__________________ -------------------------------------------------
CH. Birchrun Who's On First, aka Razzle
Foxfire N KO Simply Madness WAC, aka Connor |
| |
06-12-2008, 07:56 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Big Dog | Tried to delete double post. Can't figure out how.
Last edited by White Cleats; 06-12-2008 at 08:03 PM..
|
| |
06-12-2008, 07:59 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Big Dog | Quote:
Originally Posted by Murreydobe The DPCA has tried to get the AKC to deny registration to albinos and z factored dogs for over 30 years now..it ain't ever gonna happen. | Yeah, I know. And every time I have cause to come in contact with an AKC official and bring this idea up, I get the same old tired answer. But the old guard, with their ways of thinking, have to die eventually. New blood with aggressive ideas on how to solve problems can (if they lobby) take their place. I can't help but labor under the idea of "maybe some day...". |
| |
06-12-2008, 08:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Alpha
Posts: 818
Dogs Name: Kinder & Didi Titles: Ch. and working on obedience Dogs Age: 3 years and 20 months
Gallery Pics: 6 Visit Caelestis's Gallery Thanks: 198
Thanked 930 Times in 386 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gatehouse Caelestis, just to pick your brain :-)
what would you suggest doing for a national club for a breeder who advertises on their website that they belong to said club, when they do not. They have been asked to remove their claim. They haven't or won't.
Pretty frustrating, but thanks to members on here (frank P) and their investigations and research such things come to our attention.
This person was asked over a year ago apparently to remove the reference and did not.
That' ticks me off!!!! | If you can find someone to actually update the DPCC website, they might consider adding a page that states which members are in good standing with a line that states "While people may claim to be members in good standing of this club, only the following breeders listed below are, infact, members in good standing as of XXX date". This is different than the breeder listing page on which they pay to be advertised, since this page would not contain a link to any breeders webpages etc...
You could also have a demand letter issued from a lawyer (though any actual action would be costly and if I recall the DPCC is not for profit, yes?). Perhaps the CKC can send a letter demanding removal of any false claims to having membership of a CKC sanctioned club? Is there a CKC bylaw that prohibits false claims of being a member of a CKC sanctioned club when you are not? If so, they could take action that way.
My name is Jennifer btw... ;-) |
| |
06-12-2008, 08:08 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Alpha
Posts: 818
Dogs Name: Kinder & Didi Titles: Ch. and working on obedience Dogs Age: 3 years and 20 months
Gallery Pics: 6 Visit Caelestis's Gallery Thanks: 198
Thanked 930 Times in 386 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by White Cleats Yeah, I know. And every time I have cause to come in contact with an AKC official and bring this idea up, I get the same old tired answer. But the old guard, with their ways of thinking, have to die eventually. New blood with aggressive ideas on how to solve problems can (if they lobby) take their place. I can't help but labor under the idea of "maybe some day...". | Uhh....the first poster was right, "aint never gonna happen". The AKC and CKC are registering bodies, they make their profits off registrations and they are certianly not going to cut anything that represents revenue for them. Particularly when many dogs who are not conformation worthy can still be registered and shown in other AKC and CKC sanctioned events. I know it may be a but of a shock, but conformation is not the be all and end all for everyone. ;-)))) |
| |
06-12-2008, 09:09 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Alpha | Hi Jennifer, thanks!
I thought the same thing, in a round about way LOL I thought we could have a separate link of members "not in good standing" LOL
However you have pointed something that's maybe been overlooked, something as simple as the CKC by-laws and how they affect a member who makes false claims on their site involving another club. This is such an easy thing to prove - you either paid your dues or you didn't - black and white, but I agree, unless you are growing money in your backyard and have buckets of it, no way no how would I ever suggest anyone go to court.....
Thanks!
Maura
__________________ www.gatehousedobermanns.com |
| |
06-12-2008, 11:26 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Big Dog | Quote:
Originally Posted by Caelestis I know it may be a but of a shock, but conformation is not the be all and end all for everyone. ;-)))) | I'm confused.
Last edited by White Cleats; 06-12-2008 at 11:30 PM..
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | Mortgage | Secured Loans | Car Loan | Home Insurance | eHarmony Coupon All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM. |